Posted by: Lipstick Piggy | October 1, 2008

Obama not ready to lead on Economy | Clinton tries to teach

As we look to history to help craft our views and track economic wins and losses, we must ask ourselves does Sen Obama have the experience to tackle the current problem of our economy.  Bill Clinton and Sen Obama clearly have differing points of view on reality in the economic arena. 

Can anyone actually show me one article or evidence of ANY EXPERIENCE Sen Obama has in running any annual operating budget of at least $10 Billion?   Sarah Palin as Govenor of Alaska has an operating budet of $11.2 billion.  While she might be less eloquently trained in debate as Sen Obama is from his Harvard days, she has far and away the most economic experience than either Democratic candidate.  I can’t wait for the debate tomorrow.

Bill Clinton sets the record straight on the path towards the current economic crisis.  He states he does not regret signing the deregulating bill Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act that repealled the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 into law.  

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act passed the Senate on a 90-8 vote, including 38 Democrats and such notable Obama supporters as Chuck Schumer, John Kerry, Chris Dodd, John Edwards, Dick Durbin, Tom Daschle — oh, and Joe Biden. Mr. Schumer was especially fulsome in his endorsement.

Mr. Obama’s “deregulation” trope may be good politics, but it’s bad history and is dangerous if he really believes it. The U.S. is going to need a stable, innovative financial system after this panic ends, and we won’t get that if Mr. Obama and his media chorus think the answer is to return to Depression-era rules amid global financial competition. Perhaps the Senator should ask the former President for a briefing.

For the full article from the Wall Street Journal Click Here.

Advertisements

Responses

  1. Do you Think Sarah Palin is ready to lead? Is she even ready to tie her own shoes?? Do you need a reason to vote in 2008? Or maybe a reason to watch the VP Debate on Thursday? How about some fact about Sarah Palin?

  2. Liberals are hypocrites. They put up a really inexperienced candidate, but all of a sudden experience was so important when it came to Palin. The irony is that Palin has way more relevant experience than Obama. Then again, Democrats never use logic or else they wouldn’t be Democrats. Liberalism is a mental disorder. In any case, Palin is going destroy Joe Biden in the debate. She is a master Debater. Just look at the photos here for proof:

    [website reference removed due to questionable taste]

  3. “Liberalism is a mental disorder”, you are a jackass! Just because liberals do not believe what you do, they must have a mental disorder? Palin has not said or done anything that gives me faith that she can lead anything. Even the people in Alsaka are starting to see through her BS. She is no longer the most popular govener in the country. Good luck Repub’s. Just watch the debate and it will all become clear to you!

  4. Go back to drinking Rush’s Kool-aid!

  5. Liberalism is a mental disorder is Michael Savage — not Rush… silly.

    You’ve got to get on top of your game with Conservative Talk Radio. Good thing you are not doing the debate tonight. ROFLMAO

  6. My bad, I get them mixed up all the time. I am a person who likes to listen to all points of view so I do listen to “most of them… all of them, any of them”. Sorry I could not help myself from using that quote from Palin reguarding who she reads.

    It is funny that you mention Savage, he has said himself that Plain is not qualified for this job.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: